RT Grills Israeli Spokesperson On Atrocities In Gaza

The Rothschilds and National Socialism

 SOURCE


Written by Green Arrow

Been a very busy and illuminating time for me over the past five or six days - and I must confess that by the time I had considered myself well enough informed to write about what follows, my ageing brain was almost overloaded with the amount of information I had to upload into it before processing it.

As is usual, the title of the article gives you a clue towards the contents of the article and I am sure that it is going to have some of you "fluffy nationalists" foaming at the mouth like Weyman Bennett speaking at a David Cameron endorsed UAF meeting.

Now I have heard the analogy, that the True British people are not yet ready for the truth and that we must spoon-feed them like babies.  Feed them with little mouthfuls of truth like tiny infants until they can move onto "real" food at some unspecified date in the way distant future.  Now this is a philosophy that I once subscribed to.  I was wrong - I am often wrong but I learn in the end and usually the hard way - which is sometimes the best way to learn.

All we have done by NOT telling the WHOLE truth and feeding the public baby food instead of good British Beef packed full of truth, is turn out a generation of wimps, girlie boys, perverts, cowards and appeasers, like those found in the Zionist puppet British Freedom Party, whose homosexual division (seriously) have wet themselves with excitement over the fact that some shite Asian Magazine for the colonisers of Our Country, have said that the BFP and their pro Israeli English Defence League (name derived from the Jewish Defence League) have said they are not racists.  Well they damn well should be - but licking arse (or should I use the more publicly palatable word "Rimming") is what the British Freedom Party are all about, so we should not be surprised.

Now I know that this site is read by many who already know the truth but regrettably instead of writing about it and sending in articles to reach a bigger audience, they are happy just to have the occasional comment published.  That must stop.  Write those bloody articles and send them in.
Meanwhile, I shall now attempt to force feed those of you who have been sucking up the brain numbing pap that others want to feed you to keep you weak, a good portion of Truth that will, if your stomachs are strong enough to digest, make you much much stronger.

Now then, a quick reminder of just who the Rothschilds are and how they started off on their quest to own the world with the connivance of other Jews and corrupt goyim/cattle and to enslave the non-Jews who live on its surface.  I shall, of course be accused of being anti-Semitic for publishing this but so be it.  Truth is, by the end of the article, I will be probably be accused of being a Nazi and I do not have a problem with that either.

The founder of the House of Rothschild was Mayer Anselm Bauer, a money lender who traded under the sign of a red shield (Rothschild), in Jew Street, Frankfurt. Using money embezzled from William of Hesse, Mayer set up branches of the House of Rothschild in Berlin, Vienna, Paris, Naples and London.

Bauer, now with his name changed to, Rothschild placed a son in charge of each of the overseas branches. Amschel  in Berlin, Salomon in Vienna, Jacob in Paris, Kalmann in Naples, whilst Nathan set up the headquarters of the House of Rothschild in London, where it remains today.
The Rothschilds were now superbly placed to take their first steps in stealing the wealth of the world.  They knew that the best and most secure way of making money was to lend it to governments - especially to governments who were at war, who would agree to any terms the bankers demanded so long as they had the money to fight their wars.

Napoleon's early rise was secretly funded by the Rothschilds who wanted a war that would enrich them beyond a normal persons dreams and when Napoleon discovered the painful truth about who controlled him and why: “Let me issue and control a nation’s money and I care not who writes the laws.” Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1744-1812), founder of the House of Rothschild. Napoleon threw of their shackles and that sealed his fate, the destruction of his Grande Armee and his future murder by Rothschild agents, who used arsenic to poison him whilst he was imprisoned on the island of Saint Helena.

When a government is dependent upon bankers for money, they and not the leaders of the government control the situation, since the hand that gives is above the hand that takes… Money has no motherland; financiers are without patriotism and without decency; their sole object is gain.” – Napoleon Bonaparte, Emperor of France, 1815

Now if you do your own research, you will discover that as well as the Napoleonic Wars, the Rothschilds Dynasty have encouraged, incited and funded wars that could NEVER have taken place without them and the magic money (fractional banking) created out of NOTHING.

The modern banking system manufactures money out of nothing. The process is, perhaps, the most astounding piece of sleight of hand that was ever invented. Banks can in fact inflate, mint and un-mint the modern ledger-entry currency.” Major L L B Angus.

Money used to start wars in which untold millions of white people have died just to enrich Jewish Bankers as individuals and advance World Jewry's quest to rule the world by owning all of it whilst destroying Nations and political parties that speak out against their evil plan and encouraging and funding political parties that misguidedly or knowingly support the Zionist cause.

• The rise of Napoleon I as the chosen Rothschild agent for toppling of the Monarchs of Europe;
• The fall of the Romanov Dynasty and the destruction of Christian Russia at the hands of the Bolshevik Communists;
• The Anglo-Boer War of genocide, a most important war at the turn of the 19th century that was swept under the carpet.
• The Great War 1914-1918
• The 2nd World War 193(2)9 - 1945.  World Jews declare war on Germany
• The War against the Palestinian People
• The illegal War against Serbia
• The illegal War against Afghanistan
• The illegal War against Iraq
• The illegal War against Lybia
• The coming illegal Wars against Syria and Iran.

Now it is estimated that the Rothschilds own over 60% of the worlds wealth.  During the chaos of wars and depression they ALWAYS convert their worthless paper money into tangible assets such as gold, islands, land and property, and in the past were proud to boast of their achievements, but a few decades ago they realised that even the most stupid of cattle were beginning to be aware of their machinations - they have become far more secretive and few people realise that most major companies such as Sun Alliance are owned by them and that their wealth is now greater than that of many large nations.

Regular readers and trackers of Zionism already know that 96% of the World Media, including Hollywood is controlled by Jews and has been for decades although they are constantly trying to deny this through their lick-spittle agents of the Jewish run Anti-Defamation League.
As a break from reading hundreds of links on the Rothschilds, I took time out to watch some old black and white movies that are now out of copyright and therefore free to download and so I am going to ask that you take the time out to watch them after you have finished reading this article or later when you have time.

 The first film is The House of Rothschild that was produced and directed by Jews and released in 1934.  Remember that World Jewry had declared war on Germany in 1933 but were agitating for it even before Hitler came to power.  The film then was intended to show the Rothschilds in a positive light and to gain sympathy for them, whilst subliminally sending out a message that to speak out against them was anti-Semitic.

I actually enjoyed watching the film as it was very well made for its time.  There was the scene in the beginning where the Rothschilds hide their wealth from the tax collector (who turns out to be corrupt), the truth exposed when the father lectures his five sons on the power of money and their duty to Jews the world over and then the laughable bit, where during the Napoleonic wars, the Rothschilds alone keep the London Stock exchange going by buying up everything in site as the market collapses.  This of course is the complete opposite of what Nathan Rothschild actually did.

At the end of the film, the Rothschilds are successful, shown to be the saviours of Europe, get the law changed so that Nathan may be made a Baron and finally accepted in the non-Jewish World as an equal.  Quite sickening really, as there is no mention of the fortune they had made by financing the war that would have put them out of business had Wellington (their personal friend) been defeated at Waterloo - but still a film you must watch if you have any real interest in who rules the world.  You can either watch or download the film here or go get it on youtube here.

So then, where are we now?  Well the white world now, is where Germany was prior to 1933.  Firmly under the control of the worlds Zionist Bankers who seek to destroy nation states in order to control them.

In 1933 Germany, with the rise of Hitler, the German people were reclaiming control of their country and financial systems and doing it rather successfully with National Socialist policies and so National Socialism and the home of it, Germany, had to be destroyed and punished by the Zionists and there in lies the problem we now face as Nationalists.

Our nation is a shambles, the Jews having brought us to the brink of bankruptcy with our young soldiers dying in illegal foreign wars demanded by the Jews who rule us as part of the Rothschild Empire.

Before I continue with the above theme, it is now time for us to go watch our second black and white movie. This time it is one that is often pointed at by Jews to show how anti-Semitc opposition to their plans to world domination is and to denigrate the words National Socialism - the only political philosophy that is able to halt and reverse the Zionist plans for the demise of the white race they hate.

 The film is of course The Eternal Jew that was released in Germany in 1940 and even the Jews have had to admit that it has been one of the most successful "propaganda" films that reveals the truth about Zionism ever released.

So what did I make of it?  Well first off, I recommend you download it here so you can watch it full screen.  This version has an English voice over translation which should make it easier for you to watch.  My version was subtitled but still very engrossing.

The first part about the Jews in Poland and the comparisons to rats in the beginning, I think was unnecessary but then again we are watching the film 72 years after it was made but this is why you simply must watch this film.

Because what you see happening in 1930's Germany with the control over the economy of the Jewish Bankers, their pollution of German culture, film making, publishing, press, radio, education and politics is everything that is happening NOW in Our Country.  Just think about the artistic abominations, the filth on the TV, the lionization of perverts and paedophiles that we True Brits are subjected to.

The final part of the film, which you should only watch if you have a strong stomach, is why National Socialists are opposed to the method in which both Jews and Moslems slaughter their animals for meat products and has nothing to do with them being Jews or Moslems - it is their sick religions that say this is the way animals must die.  It is just plain cruel and barbaric.
If anyone who watches this film ever buys anything they even suspect of being killed in this way or  buys food from their fast shite shops, then I say a pox on them and their first born.
Now I am sure that what I write next, is going to dismay some of you but it must be said.

The reasons that you see constant references to National Socialist policies being those of the "Nazis", is to link those policies - which would destroy the Jewish fraudulent Banking system in an heart beat and take back into public ownership the assets the traitors infesting our governments have sold off to their Jewish controllers - to the greatest fraud the world as even seen.  The Holohoax.
And why is the Holohoax so important to the Zionists?  Well just go watch this video here.  This former Jewish Minister explains it much better than I could and as a Jewess will be far more credible than I, when she says; "It's a trick, we always use it".

Now then, we know that National Socialism is the only cure for those destroying nations and the peace of the world but for it to become accepted we must stop concealing the truth for fear of upsetting the ignorant sheep people and tell the truth no matter what.  The more people who say National Socialism is the only way forward, the sooner the truth will be out there.
Our enemies count on us denying that we are National Socialists for fear of being tarred as Nazi's.
 I say, let them call us what they will, you expect your enemies to slander you.

As Joseph Goebbels said just before the end in 1945.  "There will come a day, when all the lies will collapse under their own weight, and truth will again triumph.”

Be proud to be a National Socialist - I am.

RAMZPAUL: Newsweek Magazine Gives GOP Advice

RT: "Two Party System Is An Illusion, Both Funded By The Same Source"

HowStuffWorks.com Perpetuates Anti Nazi Lies / The Truth About The Big Lie

I caught a glimpse of a story on howstuffworks.com the other day entitled "The 10 Biggest Lies In History" and on the cover was none other than Adolf Hitler himself. Immediately I knew what I would find. So we get down to number 1 in the list of the 10 biggest lies in history and it is

"By the time Nazism arose in Germany in the 1930s, anti-Semitism was nothing new -- not by a long shot. The J­ewish people had suffered a long history of prejudice and persecution. And although Nazis perpetuated centuries-old lies, this time those lies would have their most devastating effects. Like never before, anti-Semitism was manifested in a sweeping national policy known as "the Final Solution," which sought to eliminate Jews from the face of the Earth.  That's interesting considering no paper exists with this as policy and we have nothing but the jew saying this was the case, forgive me for not trusting them, Kol Nidre and all that.

To accomplish this, Adolf Hitler and his minister of propaganda, Joseph Goebbels, launched a massive campaign to convince the German people that the Jews were their enemies. Having taken over the press, they spread lies blaming Jews for all of Germany's problems, including the loss of World War I. One outrageous lie dating back to the Middle Ages claimed that Jews engaged in the ritual killings of Christian children and used their blood in the unleavened bread eaten at Passover [source: Landau].

Using Jews as the scapegoat, Hitler and his cronies orchestrated what they called "the big lie." This theory states that no matter how big the lie is (or more precisely, because it's so big), people will believe it if you repeat it enough. Everyone tells small lies, Hitler reasoned, but few have the guts to tell colossal lies [source: Hoffer]. Because a big lie is so unlikely, people will come to accept it.
This theory helps us understand so many of the lies throughout history. Although we've barely scratched the surface of all those lies that deserve (dis)honorable mentions, you can satiate your historical curiosity by browsing the lists on the next page."

I'm not sure whether to be glad when anti German writers bring up "the big lie" and attribute it to Hitler, or sad. On one hand it is so, so easy to debunk and show them for the fools they are. On the other hand it just perpetuates myths about Nazi Germany.

Well since this debunking doesn't take much work, here is what Hitler was actually talking about regarding "the big lie"


"But it remained for the Jews, with their unqualified capacity for falsehood, and their fighting comrades, the Marxists, to impute responsibility for the downfall [of Germany in WWI] precisely to the man who alone had shown a superhuman will and energy in his effort to prevent the catastrophe which he had foreseen and to save the nation from that hour of complete overthrow and shame. By placing responsibility for the loss of the world war on the shoulders of Ludendorff they took away the weapon of moral right from the only adversary dangerous enough to be likely to succeed in bringing the betrayers of the Fatherland to Justice. All this was inspired by the principle -- which is quite true in itself -- that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper stata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily, and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying. These people know only too well how to use falsehood for the basest purposes.

From time immemorial, however, the Jews have known better than any others how falsehood and calumny can be exploited. Is not their very existence founded on one great lie, namely, that they are a religious community, whereas in reality they are a race? And what a race! One of the greatest thinkers that mankind has produced has branded the Jews for all time with a statement which is profoundly and exactly true. He (Schopenhauer) called the Jew "The Great Master of Lies." Those who do not realize the truth of that statement, or do not wish to believe it, will never be able to lend a hand in helping Truth to prevail."


Now anyone with a room temperature IQ can clearly see that Hitler was accusing the jews of deceiving people by using "the big lie". How ironic that these writers attribute this to Hitler when in reality it was Hitler showing this to the world. Reminds me of the old polish proverb "the jew cries out in pain as he strikes you"

But wait you may be saying, the article said Goebbels also helped spread "the big lie" Here is what Goebbels actually said on the subject

In a 1941 article titled “ Churchill’s Lie Factory,” he wrote:

“One should not as a rule reveal one’s secrets, since one does not know if and when one may need them again. The essential English leadership secret does not depend on particular intelligence. Rather, it depends on a remarkably stupid thick-headedness. The English follow the principle that when one lies, one should lie big, and stick to it. They keep up their lies, even at the risk of looking ridiculous.”


So again, as with 99.99% of everything else you read about Nazi Germany, this story at howstuffworks.com is a complete sham.

How the Jews Undermine America

Golden Dawn Reads Passages From The Protocols In Parliament!

SOURCE


A lawmaker for Greece's neo-Nazi Golden Dawn Party has reportedly read out in parliament a passage from the anti-Semitic forgery The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

Ilias Kasidiaris, a spokesperson for Golden Dawn, read out Protocol 19 from the book: "In order to destroy the prestige of heroism we shall send them for trial in the category of theft, murder and every kind of abominable and filthy crime," according to Panayote Dimitras of the Greek Helsinki Monitor.

Kasidiaris was addressing parliament on October 23 at a discussion on lifting his immunity in connection with suspicions of assault. “There was absolutely no reaction” to this in parliament, Dimitras said, which, makes “all parties held as accomplices.”

In a written statement Friday, the Foreign Affairs Network of B'nai B’rith Europe called the manuscript’s reading in an EU parliament “a sign of moral corruption and degradation which must not be overlooked.” The silence with which the reading was received was “doubly worrisome,” the network wrote in its statement.

Israeli Snipers Killing U S Troops in Iraq Creating Chaos

From the video description.

Anderson Cooper of CNN showed this video of snipers killing U.S. troops in Iraq on his October 18, 2006 show. CNN says it obtained the video from a "representative" of an unnamed "insurgent leader." Bear in mind that Anderson Cooper used to work for the CIA.

Richard Wilson's hypothesis: Israeli soldiers and/or Mossad agents are killing our soldiers in Iraq in order to enrage American troops so that the slaughter continues.

Proof: At the very beginning of this video clip, you see a rifle with a video camera attached to it. This weapon is made by the Rafael company, an Israeli arms manufacturer, that also makes IEDs. If you watch the video all the way through, it explains how this rifle works. CNN stated that the camera used to film these shootings was not a mounted rifle camera. But as you watch the video, you see that with each shot fired, the camera recoils. That would only happen if it were mounted on the rifle. Why is this significant? Because this kind of rifle-camera is extremely sophisticated and not available to your average Iraqi insurgent. I mean, it's not exactly an easily obtainable Saturday night special! Something this sophisticated points to Mossad.

Mossad is a master at false flag operations, e.g., Oklahoma City, the attack on the USS Cole in Yemen, the bombing of the Israeli Embassy in Buenos Aires, the July 7, 2005 London bombings, the 9-11 attacks in New York, the assassination of the Prime Minister in Beirut, the stoking of Muslim riots in France last year, the bombing of the Hassan al-Askari Mosque in Samarra, Iraq, etc.

Israelis freely move among US and UK troops in Iraq, and have access to top-level US intelligence. Until July 2003, the head of all US forces in Iraq and Afghanistan was General Tommy Franks, a Zionist Jew. (He is now on the board of directors for Bank of America.) On November 7, 2006 another Zionist Jew became a principle liaison between Mossad and US forces in Iraq: Major General Richard F. Natonski of the Marine Corps. His title is Deputy Commandant for Plans, Policies and Operations.

Because of this access, the "insurgents" (i.e., Mossad agents) know exactly where US vehicles will be and who will be inside them. This allows them to target for maximum false flag effect.

For example, on July 23, 2005, a detachment of 19 female US Marines was sent to Fallujah to check Iraqi women for bombs. An IED blew up their truck. Two of the young American women were killed, five were critically wounded, and four were captured. The bodies of the four captured women turned up later in a garbage dump with their throats cut. Americans were outraged. Islamic clerics insisted that only Israelis could be so cold-blooded. And who was in charge of US forces in Fallujah at the time? None other than Major General Natonski, the Mossad liaison.

Americans are supposed to believe that rag-tag "insurgents" use IEDs powerful enough to kill three US troops per day, on average. An American soldier even set up a blog on how "Intel" is betraying and targeting US troops. But sometimes Mossad bomb-makers accidentally blow themselves up in Iraq.

According to Richard Wilson, Israeli sniping and IEDs are false flag operations. He says that on March 28, 2005, Americans arrested 19 Mossad agents who fired twice on a US Marine checkpoint. The Marines beat up the Mossad agents and tore off their Star-of-David necklaces. (The US media incorrectly said the agents were Americans.) The Mossad agents said they were employees of Zapata Engineering, which helps the CIA conduct interrogations, and also manages US ammo dumps and US motor pools in Iraq.

IEDs in Iraq are powerful enough to flip over a 70-ton tank. Some of the models shoot depleted-uranium projectiles, and are triggered by electronic devices surreptitiously planted on US armored vehicles. Zapata Engineering (which employs Mossad agents) makes this exact kind of trigger, and oversees some of the US motor pools.

Rumsfeld says the IEDs come from Iran, but Richard says they come from Mossad, and are not "improvised" at all. The Israeli company, Rafael (see above), makes IEDS, which are buried in the middle of a road. Beside the road is a device which emits a laser or radio signal. This device is manufactured by firms like Zapata Engineering, which is controlled by Zionist Jews. The IED mine, manufactured by Israel, is inert until a US vehicle (secretly planted with a triggering device) rolls over it.


Whenever Mossad carries out these false-flag operations they produce a videotape or a recording from an "unnamed source" that is "close to al-Qaeda." Sometimes they say "the claim was posted on an Internet website, but its authenticity could not be verified."

But Israelis would never kill anyone in cold blood, would they? After all, the USS Liberty massacre was "an accident!"

DSK's "Eyes Wide Shut" Lifestyle Exposed

 SOURCE

It has been my contention for a very long time now, that the reason most people in positions of power do absolutely nothing for the good of their respective societies even in the face of total systemic collapse is not simply greed, corruption and stupidity.  They are totally compromised.
As we see in this amazing article from the NY Times, former IMF head, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, lived a decadent lifestyle straight out of Stanley Kubrick’s final film Eyes Wide Shut (which was clearly a warning about the perversion rampant within the elite class).  I am not judging his lifestyle so much as saying that when the most powerful leaders in the financial world are behaving like this they are incapable of ever doing the right thing because they are compromised and can be blackmailed into anything.  I will allow these quotes from the article speak for themselves.

That defense and the investigation, which is facing a critical judicial hearing in late November, have offered a keyhole view into a clandestine practice in certain powerful circles of French society: secret soirees with lawyers, judges, police officials, journalists and musicians that start with a fine meal and end with naked guests and public sex with multiple partners.  (Sounds like a description of the Bilderberg group!)

The exclusive orgies called “parties fines” — lavish Champagne affairs costing around $13,000 each — were organized as a roving international circuit from Paris to Washington by businessmen seeking to ingratiate themselves with Mr. Strauss-Kahn. Some of that money, according to a lawyer for the main host, ultimately paid for prostitutes because of a shortage of women at the mixed soirees orchestrated largely for the benefit of Mr. Strauss-Kahn, who sometimes sought sex with three or four women.

At L’Aventure, Mr. Strauss-Kahn and a few friends gathered in a private basement club, carpeted in purple and black tiger stripes, with a female Belgian escort and Mr. Alderweireld’s companion, Béatrice Legrain, who recalled that lunch in an interview.

The investigation into the prostitution ring in Lille ultimately swept up 10 suspects, including Mr. Strauss-Kahn. They knew each other largely through their membership as French Freemasons, according to Karl Vandamme, a defense lawyer who represents Fabrice Paszkowski, the owner of a medical supply company who played a crucial role in organizing the sex parties.

Ladies and gentlemen, you have been introduced to the leaders of the free world... and we are supposed to believe the IMF is going to save us?

Valerie Jarrett: De Facto President

SOURCE

This is the second of a series of articles WND has developed from months of confidential in-person interviews with members of Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago who have known Barack and Michelle Obama on a personal basis over many years. In the first story, members of the church claimed Barack Obama benefited from Wright’s “Down Low Club,” part of a documented underground subculture in which black men who engage in homosexual activity marry to maintain respectability in public. Because of the personal risk the sources perceived they were taking to speak candidly about the president and his family, their identities have been masked.

As a young single woman, Michelle Robinson was a fixture in the home of civil rights leader Jesse Jackson, who along with Rev. Jeremiah Wright “arranged” her marriage to Barack Obama, according to sources in Chicago who know the couple.

“If you want to understand Michelle Obama, you’ve got to go back to Jesse Jackson,” a woman called “Robyn” for this article told WND.

Robyn, who spent several years working for Jackson’s Rainbow PUSH Coalition, explained to a WND investigator in Chicago that Michelle Obama “just about grew up in Jesse Jackson’s home.”

“Jesse should have charged her rent and board for the amount of time she spent in his home instead of her own,” she said.

Jackson’s daughter, Santita, is still one of Michelle’s best friends. Santita and Jesse Jr. call her “sis,” short for “sister.”

TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THIS FANTASTIC DEAL!! Purchase the hardcover of Jerome Corsi’s “Where’s the Birth Certificate?” and receive the updated e-book version of “Where’s the REALBirth Certificate?” ABSOLUTELY FREE!

Santita Jackson said in an interview just before Obama took office in 2008 that she has known Michelle Obama since they car-pooled together as high school classmates. Santita was maid of honor at Michelle and Barack Obama’s wedding, and she is the godmother to the Obama’s older daughter, Malia.

Robyn also pointed out Jesse Jackson Jr., a Democratic Party member of the U.S. House from Illinois, served as the national co-chairman of Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign.

“It all relates back to Trinity and to the Jesse Jackson orbit of blacks here in Chicago who gave Obama legitimacy and helped him establish his identity as a black man,” Robyn explained.

“The political left wanted to push a black to the presidency, and the key operatives in the Democratic Party decided long ago it wouldn’t be Jesse Jackson (Sr.). Then Jesse wanted it to be his son, but Jesse Jr. has serious drug and mental problems that the world knows about now. These were also known about in the past, and Jesse Jr. was never going to be the black president. So, the political left then chose Obama.”

In an interview with the Chicago Sun-Times in August, Sandi Jackson admitted her husband, Jesse Jr., was “completely debilitated by depression,” which has forced him to put his Washington home for sale to pay his medical bills, including his treatment at the Mayo Clinic. He has been absent from Congress since mid-June, putting his House seat at risk in the November election.

They met where?

Obama’s retelling of an event most spouses remember precisely for the rest of their lives has caused confusion. Exactly when and how did he first meet Michelle Robinson?

Before a speech at the New Economic School graduation in Moscow on July 7, 2009, Obama stated he first met Michelle in school.

“I don’t know if anybody else will meet their future wife or husband in class like I did, but I’m sure you’re all going to have wonderful careers,” he said, according to Newsweek.

The problem is that Michelle Obama earned her degree from Harvard Law School in 1988, and Obama did not arrive at Harvard Law School until that fall, graduating three years later in 1991.

The commonly accepted story is that they first met in Chicago in 1989, when Barack took a summer job as an intern at the Chicago law firm Sidley Austin, and Michelle, who was employed as a lawyer at the firm, was assigned to be his mentor.

WND has reported Allen Hulton, the U.S. postal carrier who delivered mail to the parents of Weather Underground bomber Bill Ayers in a Chicago suburb, met Obama in the summer of 1989, while Obama was an intern at Sidley Austin.

In 1991, during their engagement to be married, top Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett, then serving as the deputy chief of staff to Mayor Richard M. Daley, hired Michelle to a job in the mayor’s office.

“Michelle hated working for the city even more than she hated working at Sidley Austin,” Robyn told WND.

“At the law firm, she lasted so short of a time because they expected her to do work,” Robyn said. “At the City of Chicago, where she worked under Mayor Daley, Michelle had one of those ‘Jesse hires’ positions. These are patronage jobs where the recipients did nothing.”

Robyn claimed that while working for Daley, Michelle just collected a check, doing very little work.

“She sat at a desk and read the newspaper all day,” Robyn said. “Sometimes she read romance novel paperbacks. No one could say anything to her because she was a ‘Jesse hire.’ This meant if anyone did complain about her not working that Jesse Jackson would get mad at Daley over that, and there would be trouble.”

Robyn said Michelle was “essentially treated like she was Jesse’s daughter, and Michelle’s connections in Chicago were a key to Obama’s rise to power.”

Connections

Political connections played throughout Michelle’s young life in Chicago.

Her father, Fraser C. Robinson III, who was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis in his 20s and eventually walked with the use of crutches, was a volunteer Democratic precinct captain in addition to his job in the boiler room at Chicago’s water purification plant.

As Democratic precinct captain, Robinson had power and influence, given his access to “street money” the Daley machine freely handed out at that time in Chicago’s South Side to make sure black voters turned out to vote for Democratic Party machine candidates.

The Chicago sources told WND the selection of Michelle Robinson for Obama was made by Jesse Jackson, and Jeremiah Wright agreed it would be a good combination.

“It all relates back to Trinity United and to the Jesse Jackson orbit of blacks here in Chicago who gave Obama legitimacy and helped him establish his identity as a black man ‘from Chicago,’” Robyn explained.

“Michelle came from a political family; she was intelligent even if she didn’t really like to work. Wright knew Obama was gay, but he needed the cover of a wife if he were to succeed in politics.”

A current member of Trinity church who has known the Obamas for 20 years, “Carolyn,” confirmed Trinity “helped a lot of blacks get successful and connected.”

“That’s what Wright did for Obama,” she claimed. “He connected Obama in the community, and he helped Obama hide his homosexuality.”

According to Robyn, Jackson explained to Michelle that she would live a life of luxury once Obama was president, and that she never again would have to worry about money.

“Michelle was nasty, and most straight guys would never be able to put up with her moods and temperament,” Robyn maintained. “But Obama really didn’t care. Michelle had the credentials and she looked the part. Obama wasn’t interested in her for sex.”

A source WND will identify as Hazel, a long-term member of the Trinity congregation, insisted Obama remained sexually involved with men after his marriage to Michelle.

“I remember being at this function at Reverend Wright’s house, one of the many parties Wright had, in 1996,” Hazel recalled.

“I went to the room where all the coats were on the bed, because I wanted to leave. I was surprised to find the light in the room was off and the coats were on the floor,” she said. “Then I realized there were two men hugging and kissing in there. One of those men was Obama. This was long before anybody knew Obama, before he became famous like he is today.”

Hazel has been telling this story in Chicago since 1996.

Cushy job

When Jarrett left Mayor Daley’s office to head Chicago’s Department of Planning and Development, she took Michelle with her.

Jarrett later became the chairwoman of the Chicago Medical Center, and Michelle again got “a cushy job at the Chicago Medical Center with a salary of $317,000,” as reported by Edward Klein on page 117 of his 2012 book “The Amateur: Barack Obama in the White House.”

New York Times reporter Jodi Kantor wrote in 2008 that Jarrett would have to be at the top of a list of people who helped Barack and Michelle Obama.

“Nearly two decades ago, Ms. Jarrett swept the young lawyers under her wing, introduced them to a wealthier and better-connected Chicago than their own, and eventually secured contacts and money essential to Mr. Obama’s long-shot Senate victory,” Kantor wrote.

Klein, in an interview with Fox News, described Jarrett as the “de facto” president of the United States, “the best friend of the first lady and soul mate of the president.”

RAMZPAUL: Naughty Numbers

CNN's Amber Lyon Reveals CNN's Lies and War Propaganda

Lew Rockwell: War And The Fed

RT: Fed Announces QE3

An Israeli Sayan’s Marching Orders: Libertarian National Finance Chairman Wayne Allyn Root is Tanking the Election

Ever since I found out Root was jewish and I began researching him in 2008 I was very suspicious. He comes off like a promoter (go figure) not someone who has deep seated values. His loyalty became very apparent this election cycle where Root gave no help to the Ron Paul campaign and in fact slandered them on RT.

This is a good article by Mark Dankof.

SOURCE

I still miss my late father, over 3 years after his passing. You can catch up on his life history here, if you are not already acquainted with who he was, and still is.

He taught me a great deal from the inside about the worlds of traveling, government, politics, sports, and human nature. His wisdom and insight always amazed me, coming from a small German American town in the American Midwest at the height of the Great Depression from a family that had nothing when it came to money, property, or education. It would be college football, World War II, the Army Air Corps, and my father’s own initiative that would change his destiny. God directed it. My father followed it.

Last night I had a dream. The dream was striking, in that when I awakened at 0217 this morning, I realized that what I saw in this nocturnal vision in the night was absolutely factual in reality, in what it depicted from over 43 years ago.

I was back in my parents’ TV room adjacent to the living room on the first floor, in south Dayton, Ohio (Oakwood) on Far Hills Avenue (south Main). My father was stationed at Wright Patterson Air Force Base and its then Air Force Logistics Command (AFLC). I was in the 8th grade again. It was early January of 1969.

Dad and I had the TV on. We were watching the NFL Today on CBS. The discussion was on the impending Super Bowl III matchup between the Don Shula coached Baltimore Colts (NFL), and the Weeb Eubank coached New York Jets (AFL) quarterbacked by counter cultural hero, Joe Namath.

The commentator was the late Bruce Roberts. He was mentioning that the betting point spread on the game was 18 points. Baltimore was an unheard of 18 point favorite to vanquish the Jets. It was obvious to me at the age of 13. Baltimore was a shoo-in.

Some other people came into the room. These were other Air Force officers who had come to my parents’ home for a New Year’s Party. They agreed with the betting line and the consensus of the NFL Today. The Colts could begin dusting off the shelf in the trophy cabinet, to make room for the World Championship Trophy already theirs.

My father said nothing. He inquired about everyone’s food and drinks. He had me accompany him to the kitchen to help my mother retrieve more goodies.

Late that night, when everyone else was gone and my mother already asleep, my father and I returned to the subject of the Super Bowl and the point spread.

He became very serious when I repeated the mantra of the NFL Today that the Colts were a shoo-in.

“Don’t be so sure on this. You remember the 8-1 spread favoring Liston over Clay (Mohammad Ali) in Miami Beach in February of ’64?”

“Yes.”

“You and I listened to that fight on my transitor radio in Alabama. You remember what happened.”

I began to get his drift. He continued.

“This really smells to me, Mark. I learned a long time ago, something you should never forget.”

“What’s that, Dad?”

“A point spread of this margin, in a game of this magnitude, spells fix. It really smells to me. Look out.”

Dad’s pigskin prediction credentials won out. The smelliest of the smelliest in what happened occurred in the first half. It is chronicled for posterity by Wikipedia. I still occasionally see Tom Matte, Earl Morrall, and Jimmy Orr in my night thoughts decades later:

“On their ensuing possession, Baltimore went from their own 20-yard line to New York’s 15-yard line in three plays, aided by Matte’s 58-yard run. But with 2 minutes left in the half, Morrall was intercepted again, at the Jets’ 2-yard line, deflating the Colts considerably. The Jets then were forced to punt on their ensuing drive, and the Colts advanced the ball to New York’s 41-yard line. What followed is one of the most famous plays in Super Bowl history. Baltimore tried a flea flicker play, which had a huge impact on the momentum of the game. Matte ran off right tackle after taking a handoff, then pitched the ball back to Morrall. The play completely fooled the NBC Camera Crew, and the Jets defense, leaving receiver Jimmy Orr wide open near the end zone. However, Morrall failed to spot him and instead threw a pass intended for running back Jerry Hill that was intercepted by Jets safety Jim Hudson as time expired, maintaining the Jets’ 7-0 lead at halftime. Earlier in the season, against the Atlanta Falcons, on the same play, Morrall had completed the same pass for a touchdown to Orr, the play’s intended target. “I was the primary receiver,” Orr said later. “Earl said he just didn’t see me. I was open from here to Tampa.” “I’m just a lineman, but I looked up and saw Jimmy open”, added center Bill Curry. “I don’t know what happened.”

Years later, Colts lineman Bubba Smith said the game had been fixed. Talk swirled around then Colts owner, Carroll Rosenbloom, a known consorter with gamblers and rather loose with betting money of his own. Rosenbloom died a decade later in a “drowning accident,” the subject of a documentary by the late Jessica Savitch of NBC News which suggested Rosenbloom’s demise wasn’t an accident, but that the longtime NFL denizen and sports gambler had been pulled under the water by several men in scuba diving gear. The truth? We will never know.

But it really smells to me.

Fast forward to 2012. The subject is Presidential politics in an election year. I’m already on record with Press TV in stating the obvious: The winner of the election is the Israeli Lobby and the War Party.

Let us then proceed to the less obvious. What in hell is Libertarian Party National Campaign Chairman Wayne Allyn Root doing hurting his own 3rd party candidates by flacking for Mitt Romney on Rupert Murdoch’s Israeli-friendly News Corp owned Fox News, with puff pieces like, “A Gold Medal for Romney in Tampa?”

The Libertarian-oriented Reason magazine for “Free Minds and Free Markets” is also wondering what is going on with this quixotic loon. They’ve got it partially figured out, as evidenced by this paragraph in the Mike Riggs op-ed:

“Root’s bio identifies him as ‘a former Libertarian vice presidential nominee’ and ‘Chairman of the LibertarianNational Campaign Committee’ and the author of a book titled ‘The Conscience of a Libertarian.’ You know what that means? It means Wayne Allyn Root is an ambassador for libertarianism, and that his columns are a direct reflection on the Libertarian Party, which has several times elected him to prominent positions despite the fact that he is a glistening PR disaster.

“Then again, nowhere in his piece for The Blaze does Root mention a single Libertarian candidate for office. This is probably a good thing, but also odd, because it’s campaign season, and the job of the Libertarian National Campaign Committee is torun Libertarian Party candidates at the local, state, and congressional levels. Mitt Romney is not a candidate for local, state, or congressional office, and he is not a Libertarian (or even a libertarian).

“So why is Wayne Allyn Root giving Romney free campaign advice, when he should be talking to, and about, Libertarian Party candidates? Are the heads of Democratic and Republican organizations writing insane memos telling Gary Johnson how to beat Obama, the bad-grade-getter? Are they telling down-ticket Libertarian Party candidates how to deflect questions about their finances?

“NOPE.

“That Root writes about Romney as if Gary Johnson did not exist is awful. What’s worse is that articles like Root’s repel the kind of people Johnson needs in November.

“As for anyone who’s still upset about The Weekly Standard’s description of this year’s LP convention as a “goat rodeo”: Why don’t you direct your rage at the clown running the Libertarian National Campaign Committee?”

This really smells to me.

And then my dream about Dad this morning and Super Bowl III in 1969 enabled me to put it together. There is another Wayne Allyn Root gig on Fox News which is the Rosetta Stone in understanding how and why the Fix is In. Wayne Allyn Root is no Libertarian. He is a Zionist Jew, a Neo-Conservative, a War Party infiltrator of the only American 3rd party which can seriously divert from Romney’s vote totals in the critical states of Ohio, Florida, Virginia, North Carolina, and Colorado, the make-or-break states for Mitt and Sheldon Adelson in this election. The evidence is here. Is Wayne Allyn Root the War Party’s ace-in-the-hole for their ultimate ace-in-the-hole in launching a war with Iran, good ol’ Mitt? What is being leveraged against Mr. Obama here? Are General Martin Dempsey’s remarks an indication that Netanyahu has now been forced to call in his chips with the Power Brokers who want war with Tehran? That Obama will be now be replaced at all costs? Time will tell.

Does all of this provide the real explanation as to why the Libertarian Party National Finance Chairman is flacking for the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) crowd? Flacking for a guy who disenfranchised Ron Paul delegates at last week’s Republican National Convention? What does Wayne Allyn Root believe about the Fed, fiat money, fractional reserve banking, the USA Patriot Acts, NSA Warrantless Wiretapping, the Department of Homeland Security, credit default swaps, mortgage banked securities, TARP, and derivatives? Does this “Libertarian” buy Romney’s recent statements about Russia? Does he support trillion dollar defense budgets? 10 billion a month in Afghanistan? 5 trillion dollar expenditures in Iraq and Afghanistan before counting costs in Libya? Syria? Preemptive war with Iran despite the NIE on Iran that debunks Israel’s propaganda through Fox News about an “imminent Iranian nuclear threat?” What about the Lavon Affair, Mr. Root? The Kennedy Assassination? The USS Liberty attack? The Pollard Spy Case, and the later AIPAC, Ben-Ami, and Novette spy cases? What about Dr. Robert Sungenis’s case for Culture Wars on Israel and 9-11, Mr. Root?

Fiat money, Perpetual War, Perpetual Intervention Abroad, a Foreign Lobby buying American elections and controlling American foreign policy, and a burgeoning domestic police state largely undertaken at the behest of the Zionist State of Israel. All apparently supported, of course, by the Libertarian Party’s National Campaign Finance Chairman as he works to get Mitt Romney elected.

It makes perfect sense to me. This guy isn’t a quixotic loon at all.

It really smells to me. The Fix is In.

What if I have a slightly different version of last night’s dream about the Super Bowl tonight, only pertaining to the Presidential election of 2012?

Try this on for size in the wee hours of the night as a political postmortem in the netherworld:

“On their ensuing possession, The Freedom from War and Zionist Bankers Party went from their own 20-yard line to The Zionist War Party’s 15-yard line in three plays, aided by Ron Paul’s 58-yard run. But with 2 minutes left in the half, Wayne Allyn Root was intercepted again, at The Zionist War Party’s 2-yard line, deflating The Freedom from War and Zionist Bankers Party considerably. The Zionist War Party was then were forced to punt on its ensuing drive, and The Freedom from War and Zionist Bankers Party advanced the ball to The Zionist War Party’s 41-yard line. What followed is one of the most famous plays in American political history before the end of the American Empire. The Freedom from War and Zionist Bankers Party tried a desperation last ditch flea-flicker, which had a huge impact on the momentum of the game. Ron Paul ran off right tackle after taking a handoff, then pitched the ball back to Wayne Allyn Root. The play completely fooled the NBC, ABC, CBS, CNN, and Fox Camera Crews, and The Zionist War Party’s defense, leaving receiver Gary Johnson wide open near the end zone. However, Wayne Allyn Root failed to spot him and instead threw a pass intended for running back Lew Rockwell that was intercepted by William Kristol of The Weekly Standard as time expired, maintaining The Zionist War Party’s 7-0 lead at halftime. Earlier in the season, against the Constitution Party, on the same play, Root had completed the same pass for a touchdown to Gary Johnson, the play’s intended target. “I was the primary receiver,” Johnson said later. “Wayne said he just didn’t see me. I was open from here to Tampa, to Mitt Romney’s suite entrance.” “I’m just a lineman, but I looked up and saw Gary open”, added grass-roots Libertarian activist Karen De Coster. “I don’t know what happened.”

This really smells to me. And hopefully to you, the reader, by now. The Fix is Truly In. My radio show listeners smelled it yesterday as well. Listen to that show for The Ugly Truth. Pleasant dreams. . . .

What It Means To Vote For Obama OR Romney

It means that you are responsible for this. Watch it, and let it sink in because this is just one of thousands. Don't let this blood be on your hands.



SOURCE

His war was almost over. Or so Marina Buckley thought when her son, Lance Cpl. Gregory Buckley Jr., told her that he would be returning from southern Afghanistan to his Marine Corps base in Hawaii in late August, three months early.

Instead, Buckley became the 1,990th U.S. service member to die in the war when, on Aug. 10, he and two other Marines were shot inside their base in Helmand Province by a man who appears to have been a member of the Afghan forces they were training.

A week later, with the death of Army Specialist James Justice in a military hospital in Germany, the U.S. military reached 2,000 dead in the nearly 11-year-old conflict, based on an analysis by the New York Times of Defense Department records. The calculation includes deaths not only in Afghanistan but also in Pakistan and other nations where U.S. forces are directly involved in aiding the war.

Nearly nine years passed before U.S. forces reached their first 1,000 dead in the war. The second 1,000 came just 27 months later, a testament to the intensity of fighting prompted by President Obama's decision to send 33,000 additional troops to Afghanistan in 2010, a policy known as the surge.

A higher casualty rate

In more ways than his family might have imagined, Buckley, who had just turned 21 when he died, typified the troops in that second wave of 1,000. According to the Times analysis, three out of four were white, nine out of 10 were enlisted service members and one out of two died in either Kandahar Province or Helmand Province in Taliban-dominated southern Afghanistan. Their average age was 26.

The dead were also disproportionately Marines like Buckley. Though the Army overall has suffered more dead in the war, the Marine Corps, with fewer troops, has had a higher casualty rate: At the height of fighting in late 2010, two out of every 1,000 Marines in Afghanistan were dying, twice the rate of the Army.

Suffering the most casualties was the 3rd Battalion, 5th Marine Regiment out of Camp Pendleton, Calif. Twenty-five of its Marines died and more than 180 were wounded, many with multiple amputations, during a seven-month deployment in Helmand that began in fall 2010.

The analysis also shows that Army casualties during the surge fell heaviest on two bases with frequently deployed units: Fort Campbell in Kentucky, home to the 101st Airborne Division, which recorded the most Army deaths in the surge, and Fort Drum in New York, home to the 10th Mountain Division.

The summer remained the peak season for fighting, with the single highest period for U.S. deaths being July, August and September 2010, when at least 143 troops died. And as has been the case since at least 2008, improvised explosive devices, known as IEDs, remained a leading cause of death and injury, along with small-arms fire, the analysis showed.

Insider attacks

But this year, a new threat emerged: attacks by Afghans dressed in the uniforms of Afghan security forces. In just the past two weeks, at least nine Americans have been killed in such insider attacks, and for the year to date, at least 39 non-Afghan troops, most of them American, have been killed by men dressed as members of the Afghan security forces, the most since the war began.

Those insider attacks have increased concerns about NATO's ability to turn security operations over to Afghan forces by 2014, the deadline set by Obama for withdrawing the remaining U.S. forces.

For families, the deaths have raised hard questions about whether the Pentagon is doing enough to protect its troops from their own allies.

Staff Sgt. Scott Dickinson was coming home early. He was originally scheduled to remain in Helmand until November 2012, but the Pentagon was pulling Marines out of Afghanistan quickly, looking to get the surge forces out of the country by fall and shrink the U.S. footprint to about 70,000 troops. He would be home in Hawaii within a week or two, he told his father early this month.

Not long after that conversation, his father, John Dickinson, saw an article about a soldier who had died just a week before he was to come home. "I thought, 'He's not safe until he sets foot in Hawaii,' " recalled Dickinson, an architect in San Diego.

He was right. Dickinson, 29, a supply specialist who had volunteered to help train Afghan forces, died with Buckley on Aug. 10. They were among six Marines killed that day in two separate attacks by men who appeared to be Afghan security force members.

Has it made a difference?

The Pentagon asserts that most of those attacks have been the result of personal grudges, disputing Taliban claims to have widely infiltrated the Afghan security forces. But the attacks have raised anew concerns about the integrity of the Afghan forces that NATO expects to secure the entire nation after NATO troops withdraw in 2014.

More fundamentally, the continued deaths, occurring even as U.S. forces are conducting fewer combat missions, have prompted service members and military families alike to wonder: Has the decade-long U.S. presence in Afghanistan made a difference?

Lt. Col. Jason Morris, the former commander of the 3rd Battalion, 5th Marine Regiment at Camp Pendleton, who led his troops in 2010 into Helmand Province, Afghanistan's opium-producing heartland, has little doubt that it has. After months of fierce fighting, he saw clear changes when he left in early 2011. Those improvements remain, he asserts, with residents participating in elections and going to school with less fear of Taliban intimidation.

"Every single Marine in my battalion could see the impact they had," he said. "Things had changed so dramatically, it was a validation of everything they had sacrificed for."

Despite his son's death, Dickinson agrees. Marina Buckley is not so sure.

She recalled how her son watched "The Notebook" five times with her because he was a romantic. "He was the most lovable, caring human being," she said. "He wore his heart on his sleeve. Beautiful, beautiful, beautiful."

He had wanted to join the Marine Corps ever since 9/11, despite her many attempts to dissuade him. He came to relish the brotherhood of the Marines and adored his first posting, in Hawaii. But deployment was a different matter. The loneliness, the heat and the Meals Ready to Eat wore on him, Buckley said. And he never felt secure living alongside Afghans, she said.

"If they want to kill themselves, let them," she said of the Afghan people. "But they are killing people who shouldn't be killed, who have lives here, and family here, and brothers and sisters here."

Ben Shalom Bernanke As A Child

Mises, Rothbard, Woods and Keiser

I started seeing grumblings last week about some blow up between Max "Bernanke is a Protestant" Keiser, and Tom Woods.  The whole thing was apparently over Max not bowing down to Mises and Rothbard which got the number one cheerleader Tom Woods quite riled up.  I do not know the ins and outs of what was said, and for the basis of this post it is somewhat irrelevant. 

After this article appeared on ZH I decided to briefly write my thoughts as well because I had wanted to get this out there for some time.

I always found it funny that the two people Lew Rockwell and Tom Woods revere the most in the space of Austrian Economics is Murray Rothbard and L v Mises (both jews of course).  I have been interested in this for some time, because arguably the Mises Institute run by Lew Rockwell is the biggest Austrian economics think tank on the planet.

I like Lew and Tom, I have listened to every one of Lew's podcasts (many of which are stellar) and routinely post videos from both of them here on the blog.  So I am not an enemy of either of these men, yet I do find it curious that they are such cheerleaders for Mises  and Rothbard, to be honest it's alittle scary.  I understand that Lew and Tom both knew Rothbard and that Lew knew Mises so it could just be that they happen to be in charge of keeping up their legacy, but to me it goes deeper than that.  By focusing on these two economists many other great economists take a back seat.  As I see it the L v Mises Institute exists to insure that Mises and Rothbard are remembered as the two heavy hitters and thus make two jews the patriarchs of the entirety of Austrian Economics thought.

To the new reader, or to the reader who doesn't understand the realm of jewish influence this observation may seem boring, but the study of jews controlling both sides of a debate or movement I find very fascinating.   Today you have economists such as Ben Bernanke, Alan Greenspan and Paul Kruggman who are also jews yet follow Keynesian principles, whereas the flip side (apparently) is Mises and Rothbard.  So you have the most prominent proponents on either side and they are all jewish?

"So what", you may be saying, "they are all jewish, well not all jews have to agree on every subject" while this is true there is no more a cohesive group of people on planet earth than the jews and that is a fact, sure they will sell their own grandmother for a nickel (no honor among thieves) but when it comes down to promoting their own be it hollywood, the music industry or any other field they do it every single day.

I really have no direct conclusion with this post, just the fact that I find it quite odd that Lew and Tom spend a disproportionate amount of time building up the legacy of Rothbard and Mises where without Lew and Tom most people today wouldn't even know their names.  If their contribution to economics was so great they wouldn't need cheerleaders constantly reminding people of their importance, and the fact that they do it with such regularity and fervor just sends up a red flag with me. 

Ultimately I find it suspicious and unfortunate that nearly every major player in economics period now is jewish, and the people today who could be great on the Austrian side seem content to just give all the credit to jews of the past.

Jewish Actress Calls For Christians To Be Thrown Into The Sea

SOURCE

"The jew punches you, and then he cries out in pain" - Polish Proverb


I recall a lot of jews claiming the President of Iran said he wanted to drown the jews by pushing them into the sea. Even though that is an utter fabrication, it is repeated often as a chant as the neo cons bang the war drum. The reality is though straight from the horses mouth that the jew wants to drown all the Christians in the sea.

The first example is apparently grounds for nuclear war, the second is just a tiny blip on the radar screen of non mainstream media sources. Hypocritical?

Here is the quote from Ellen Barkins twitter.

"C'mon #Isaac! Wash every pro-life, anti-education, anti-woman, xenophobic, gay-bashing, racist SOB right into the ocean! #RNC"


As I recall a man was taken away in his underwear and thrown into a mental hospital for saying far tamer things about the government. Again there is no hypocrisy here, move along.

Facebook Scans Chats And Posts For "Criminal Activity"

SOURCE

Facebook has added sleuthing to its array of data-mining capabilities, scanning your posts and chats for criminal activity. If the social-networking giant detects suspicious behavior, it flags the content and determines if further steps, such as informing the police, are required.

The new tidbit about the company's monitoring system comes from a Reuters interview with Facebook Chief Security Officer Joe Sullivan. Here's the lead-in to the Reuters story:

A man in his early 30s was chatting about sex with a 13-year-old South Florida girl and planned to meet her after middle-school classes the next day. Facebook's extensive but little-discussed technology for scanning postings and chats for criminal activity automatically flagged the conversation for employees, who read it and quickly called police. Officers took control of the teenager's computer and arrested the man the next day.

Facebook's software focuses on conversations between members who have a loose relationship on the social network. For example, if two users aren't friends, only recently became friends, have no mutual friends, interact with each other very little, have a significant age difference, and/or are located far from each other, the tool pays particular attention.

The scanning program looks for certain phrases found in previously obtained chat records from criminals, including sexual predators (because of the Reuters story, we know of at least one alleged child predator who is being brought before the courts as a direct result of Facebook's chat scanning). The relationship analysis and phrase material have to add up before a Facebook employee actually looks at communications and makes the final decision of whether to ping the authorities.

"We've never wanted to set up an environment where we have employees looking at private communications, so it's really important that we use technology that has a very low false-positive rate," Sullivan told Reuters. While details of the tool are still scarce, it's a well-known fact that Facebook cooperates with the police, since, like any company, it has to abide by the law. In fact, just a few months ago, Facebook complied with a police subpoena by sending over 62 pages of photos, Wall posts, messages, contacts, and past activity on the site for a murder suspect.

For more information about Facebook's stance on working with the police, I checked out these two pages: Law Enforcement and Third-Party Matters, as well as Information for Law Enforcement Authorities. It's worth noting that neither of these documents discusses the aforementioned tool (a quick search for the words "monitor" and "scan" bring up nothing).

Facebook likely wants to avoid discussing the existence of the monitoring technology in order to avoid further privacy concerns. Many users don't like the idea of having their conversations reviewed, even if it's done by software and rarely by Facebook employees.