When we think of political persecution, places such as
Tiananmen Square may come to mind. Increasingly, however, this tool of tyranny is coming
to our shores – and it is not made in China. It is, in the case I’ll discuss
today, made in Maricopa County.
Every avid news reader knows about the battles between Maricopa County
Sheriff Joe Arpaio and the federal government; Leviathan has targeted him because of his
principled stand against illegal immigration. What is not quite as well known, however, is
that the sheriff and his supporters – most notably, former Maricopa County Attorney
Andrew Thomas – have long been battling a corrupt local political machine bent on
thwarting the rule of law and benefitting itself. Not surprisingly, as in the film Walking
Tall, Arpaio’s and
Thomas’ attempt to end local corruption has come at a
price: the State Bar of Arizona (SBA) has begun prosecuting Thomas and two of his deputies
in a move that reeks of political retaliation.
One of these underlings is ex-deputy county attorney Lisa Aubuchon. The other
is ex-deputy county attorney Rachel Alexander, whom some readers may recognize as the
proprietor of the website
Intellectual Conservative.
Alexander, despite having played only the smallest of roles in
a racketeering case against the Maricopa County Supervisors, now faces
suspension of her law license and significant career damage. And outrageously,
Alexander’s supervisor, Pete Spaw, has not been charged despite having played a far
larger role in the RICO case. This has led many to conclude that Alexander is the victim
of selective prosecution.
The problems for Thomas and his deputies started when the County Supervisors
filed wrongful prosecution charges against them with the SBA, which their leftist allies
in the bar association ran with. What were these local politicians so upset about? John
Hawkins at RightWingNews.com provides some background, writing:
This didn’t sit well with the illegal-alien enablers in local
government. Hawkins continues:
Thomas brought charges against Stapley and a jury indicted him. Stapley was
also indicted for failing to disclose his real estate dealings on financial statements.
His business partner, Conley Wolfswinkel, is a convicted felon. Thomas also brought
charges against Supervisor Mary Rose Wilcox. She was indicted for voting on giving money
to Chicanos por la Causa while failing to disclose she had a sweetheart loan deal from
them. Wilcox, who drives a 2006 Corvette, gave herself prime real estate territory at
Phoenix’s Sky Harbor Airport through the "minority-owned business"
affirmative action program.
Unfortunately, though, the Maricopa Machine knows how to protect itself.
These charges were all transferred to now retired judges – one of whom resigned in
disgrace – and were dismissed. And the Machine plays dirty. At one point the
supervisors removed Thomas’ entire 30-lawyer Civil Division from his jurisdiction
– until ultimately being ordered to return it by the Arizona Court of Appeals. At
another point they allegedly hacked into Alexander’s Intellectual Conservative
website, cloaking it so that Google would block it; this severely impacted upon the
site’s traffic (the hacking damage has since been undone).
To understand the kind of political persecution the SBA is guilty of, note
that even some of Thomas’ opponents are rallying to his and his deputies’
defense. This includes the lifelong Democrat who, along with a Republican supporter of
former Democrat governor Janet Napolitano and a third colleague, paid for an advertisement
alerting fellow bar members to how their dues are being used for a political
vendetta. What follows is an excerpt:
As John Hawkins points out in his piece, when an expert (Hazard) who helped draft the American Bar Association’s ethics rules says the SBA’s charges are without merit, it should raise a red flag.
Also sounding the alarm is the Maricopa County Republican Committee, which
responded to the Machine’s injustice by taking the unusual step of condemning the
prosecution. In a formal
resolution, the MCRC pointed out that "even a columnist for the
liberal Arizona Republic, Robert Robb, has denounced the Bar’s investigation";
the MCRC concluded with, "NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Maricopa County
Republican Executive Guidance Committee that it demand the State Bar drop the baseless and
politically motivated investigation into Andrew Thomas, Lisa Aubuchon and Rachel
Alexander."
|
Yet, in the sea of injustice that is this sordid
affair, the charges against Alexander are so outrageous that even some who side with the
SBA against Thomas have defended her. For example, Arizona attorney Greg Patterson writes
that the case against Alexander – a woman "well known in the
conservative blogging community" – "is both selective and
overreaching." David Roney at SonoranAlliance.com places matters in further
perspective, writing:
Alexander is being charged, despite a long, unblemished record at MCAO [Maricopa County Attorney’s Office], solely for her role working on the RICO case. What was her role? She worked under her supervisor Pete Spaw’s direction. Shaw [sic] was an experienced RICO attorney who, according to my sources, started the drafts of the pleadings, finalized the drafts of the pleadings with Andrew Thomas, and developed the key theories in them. He exclusively dealt with opposing counsel, and filed all of the pleadings electronically. Alexander’s role consisted of mostly research for the pleadings, and taking direction from Spaw, nothing further. Yet Spaw was not charged by the Bar, only Alexander.
The real issue here is [an] allegation that Alexander sought to burden and
embarrass county supervisors. The allegation is nothing short of hilarious on its
face…. The supervisors, with a few exceptions, have done a pretty good job of
bringing poor press and embarrassment upon themselves. And they did so all without the
help of Alexander.
Without a doubt, crooks are very "embarrassed" when light is shone
on their dark deeds. Yet the ideological component cannot be overlooked. There is a full
court press on to destroy Thomas, Aubuchon and a woman running a website named
"Intellectual Conservative" for the same reason the Machine targets Sheriff Joe
Arpaio: They were pursuing an agenda some call conservative but is really just the
upholding of the rule of law – and the antithesis of liberalism.
So this is a story of corruption. There is the garden variety, in which those
who walk tall and stand against evil are targeted by those who wish to continue enriching
themselves. But then there is the kind that is another hallmark of despotic regimes:
political persecution. It is a phenomenon of fascism, whereby those who toe your line get
benefits, and those who don’t get intimidated into silence or, when they’re too
stout-hearted, destroyed.
By any means necessary.
Then, once big business and all other prominent people and entities are
marching in lock-step, you have complete control over civilization. This is Chicago –
and, it appears, Maricopa – politics. And we allow it to stand at our own peril.
"Published originally at EtherZone.com : republication allowed with this notice and hyperlink intact."
"Published originally at EtherZone.com : republication allowed with this notice and hyperlink intact."